Judgment
In the context of this wiki, we use the word judgment (or judgement) to refer to a relation that is defined inductively by a collection of inference rules. The judgments as types principle is a name for the methodology by which judgments are represented in LF.
A judgment in standard notation
Section titled “A judgment in standard notation”For example, we can define a judgment that a natural number is even. The judgement holds when is even. It is inductively defined by the following inference rules:
Judgments as types
Section titled “Judgments as types”A judgment is represented in LF using the judgments as types methodology: we represent a judgment with an LF type, where the inhabitants of this type correspond exactly to derivations of the judgement.
For example, we represent the judgment using the following signature:
%sort even {_ nat} %.%term even-z even z %.%term even-s {N nat} %pi (even N) %-> (even (s (s N))) %.The first declaration says that even is a family of types indexed by a nat. This means that for every term N : nat, there is a type even N. Note that the syntax -> is overloaded: it is used to classify both type-level families and term-level functions. We then use this type family to define the types of two term constants.
The first term constant, even-z, has type even z. This constant represents the derivation that consists of the first inference rule above, which concludes .
The second term constant even-s, corresponds to the second inference rule above, which, for any , constructs a derivation of from a derivation of . To encode this inference rule, the constant even-s is given a dependent function type.
For example, the LF term {/* syntax highlighting looks weird when it’s not actually STELF code */}
even-s z even-zrepresents the derivation
The term even-s (s (s z)) (even-s z even-z) represents a derivation that 4 is even, and so on.
See also
Section titled “See also”- Hypothetical judgements can be represented in LF in a higher-order manner, using LF binding to represent hypotheses.
- The introductions to STELF discuss how judgments are represented in LF in more detail.

